The world is experiencing an unprecedented pandemic due to the new coronavirus agent (COVID-19). Inevitably, some economic sectors will be greatly affected, since, for To prevent the spread of the virus, several restrictive measures are being adopted, especially to avoid contact between people.

Please note that this newsletter was finalized on 03/25/2020 at 4:00 pm and that our team is closely following the changes in the legal scenario, seeking the best alternatives for our clients. We know that the unique and unprecedented conjuncture will continue to bring a series of day-to-day modifications, which demand well-informed and parsimonious decision-making. We will be updating every minute and constantly prepared to inform you of all significant changes during this period.

1. recent measures

a. Law 13.979/2020 – MEASURES TO TACKLE THE PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY

The first rule issued about COVID-19 was Law no. 13,979, of February 6, 2020, regulated by MS Ordinance no. 356, of March 12, 2020.

From the labor law point of view, the new legislation foresees some situations that draw attention from the labor point of view, such as the adoption of isolation and quarantine measures of compulsory compliance, as well as the compulsory performance of medical examinations and laboratory tests.

For these cases, the law determines that the worker’s absence from work will be considered as justified absence, and the employer’s obligation to pay wages during the period of absence will remain.

The employee who is off work for more than 15 days, as long as he meets the other requirements required by law, will be entitled to ordinary sick pay, as of the 16th day off work.

So far there has been no change in the social security legislation in face of the possible restrictive measures of Law 13,979/2020. Thus, it remains mandatory to establish the inability to work, by means of a medical examination by the INSS.

For the purposes of the provisions of Law No. 13,979/2020, it is considered:

We highlight the Interministerial Ordinance nº 5/2020, published on 3/17/2020, which establishes that the non-compliance with the measures foreseen in article 3 of Law 13,979/2020 will result in the civil, criminal, and penal accountability of the offending agents.

The duty to communicate and share information lies with the occupational physicians. However, the company may collaborate with the health authorities in the immediate communication of: (i) possible contacts with coronavirus infectious agents; and, (ii) circulation in areas considered as coronavirus contamination regions.

The sharing of essential data to identify people infected or suspected of being infected with COVID-19 is mandatory and its sole purpose is to prevent the spread of the disease. However, this obligation will also extend to companies when the data is requested by a health authority.

b. MP’s no. 927 and 928/2020 – LABOR ALTERNATIVES FOR FACING THE STATE OF PUBLIC CALAMITY

On 03/22/2020 the Federal Government published the Provisional Measure no. 927/2020 with the main labor measures to face the state of public calamity and public health emergency of international importance due to the coronavirus (COVID-19).

The MP regulated some of the options that were already being used by companies, such as telecommuting, further reducing the labor risk involved in such practices. The MP considers validated the labor measures adopted by employers in the thirty-day period prior to the date it goes into effect, as long as they do not contradict the provisions of the MP.

The main point of PM 927/2020 is the possibility of entering into individual written agreements with employees, regardless of the salary amount, which will prevail over other normative, legal, and negotiating instruments, as long as the limits of the Federal Constitution are respected.

However, after a number of criticisms of PM 927/2020, especially regarding the possibility of suspending employment contracts for 4 (four) months by means of an individual agreement between the parties, without any type of compensation, the Federal Government revoked this possibility by means of PM 928/2020 published on 03/23/2020.

MP 928/2020 also amends the Access to Information Law (Law 12.527/2011), suspending response deadlines for Public Administration bodies or entities that are in quarantine, telecommuting or equivalent, and that rely on:

Thus, with the repeal of article 18 (suspension of labor contract) by MP 928/2020, the main measures to tackle the crisis proposed by the Government with MP 927/2020, were:

Teleworking

Individual and Collective Holidays

Holidays

Hour bank

Suspension of Administrative Requirements on Occupational Health and Safety

Suspension of the FGTS payment deadline

Other Provisions

2. Existing Mechanisms (pre-pandemic) for Dealing with Labor Issues

In addition to the measures already announced, there are some options in current legislation for application in times of crisis that, although not specific to the current pandemic situation, are valid solutions that can be implemented by employers right away.

Some of these options, especially those dealing with pay and working hours reduction, depend on collective bargaining, but others can be agreed upon directly with the employees. See below, in a summarized way, each one of them:

Lay Off

Lay-offs are provided for in two ways in the legislation:

In both cases there must be collective bargaining with the Union.

The first hypothesis deals with the reduction of wages and working hours to adapt to temporary retraction scenarios.

The option foreseen in article 476-A of the CLT foresees the suspension of contracts for a period of two to five months, requiring as a counterpart the funding of a professional qualification course or program.

As the contract will be suspended and no wages will be paid, the object of the negotiation with the Union will include monthly compensatory aid (such as scholarships) and maintenance of benefits such as health insurance.

This possibility had been included in the Provisional Measure 927/2020, by individual negotiation, but it was harshly criticized, especially for allowing employees to go 4 months without wages and without any counterpart from the government (release of FAT or unemployment insurance) or from the company.

Paid leave

In paid leave, the employee stops providing services for a certain period of time, without loss of pay. In this case, the leave period counts as a period of service, since it constitutes an interruption of the employment contract with normal payment of wages.

It is recommended that the leave, even if paid, be reduced to writing, in order to provide a deadline for returning to work, with the possibility of extension or suspension at any time, due to the exceptional situation in which the leave is granted.

We clarify, finally, that the above text is not exhaustive and does not represent or replace a specific recommendation from an analysis of the case.

The labor team at DDSA – De Luca, Derenusson, Schuttoff Advogados will be available to guide its clients.